Answer security questions from facts, not memory
Use reviewed policies, evidence records and shared documents as the source for customer responses. AI can help draft language, but owners approve the final answer.
Who this is for: For teams that answer security questionnaires during sales cycles and want fewer one-off responses.
Start from approved material
Use policies, trust documents and evidence records as the source instead of asking each team to rewrite answers from memory.
Keep owners in the loop
Statements about access, encryption, vendors or incident response should be reviewed by the person responsible for that control.
Be clear about automation
Bulk questionnaire import and answer matching should be discussed only when enabled for the customer. Until then, use supervised drafting from reviewed material.
Common questions
Do we still need an auditor?
Yes. We help you prepare the work: scope, owners, policies, risks and evidence. An auditor still decides what is acceptable for certification, and legal interpretation stays with qualified advisers.
Which integrations are available today?
The current evidence sources are GitHub, Google Workspace and AWS. Jira can be used for remediation work. Other systems should be treated as manual evidence unless they are scoped separately.
What can AI help with?
AI can prepare drafts, summarise notes and suggest first-pass wording. Scope, evidence approval, legal interpretation and customer-facing statements still need owner review.
Which standards should we lead with?
ISO 27001 and GDPR are the strongest starting points. SOC 2, NIS2 and DORA can be handled as preparation or mapping work once the exact scope is agreed.