Access reviews with a clear owner
Access control drifts quickly in small teams. Use supported admin checks and manual notes to keep privileged access, user lifecycle signals and follow-up work visible.
Who this is for: For teams that need access-review evidence for ISO 27001, GDPR security measures and customer diligence.
Review admin access
Collect GitHub organisation admins, Google Workspace admins and AWS privileged-access signals for review.
- GitHub admin review
- Google Workspace admin review
- AWS privileged access notes
Turn findings into follow-up
If a review raises an issue, create a remediation task and keep the due date attached to the evidence record.
Keep the boundary clear
Access-review evidence is supported. Full HR lifecycle automation should be scoped separately before it is included in a plan.
Common questions
Do we still need an auditor?
Yes. We help you prepare the work: scope, owners, policies, risks and evidence. An auditor still decides what is acceptable for certification, and legal interpretation stays with qualified advisers.
Which integrations are available today?
The current evidence sources are GitHub, Google Workspace and AWS. Jira can be used for remediation work. Other systems should be treated as manual evidence unless they are scoped separately.
What can AI help with?
AI can prepare drafts, summarise notes and suggest first-pass wording. Scope, evidence approval, legal interpretation and customer-facing statements still need owner review.
Which standards should we lead with?
ISO 27001 and GDPR are the strongest starting points. SOC 2, NIS2 and DORA can be handled as preparation or mapping work once the exact scope is agreed.